I'd say it's an all-rounder, attempting to fold in all kinds of sociology, literary criticism, art history as well as politics. In actual fact there's not so much economics in it, that reflects my own bias more than anything. The New Yorker piece linked above is a fair intro to the whole thing. If you can't find it you know where to ask.
Ain't me doing the cracking, big boy. Thank Ms Berlant here for exposing your synapses to this great stuff - not least of which is the reference to the Johnson story. A true belter IMO.
I'd say it's an all-rounder, attempting to fold in all kinds of sociology, literary criticism, art history as well as politics. In actual fact there's not so much economics in it, that reflects my own bias more than anything. The New Yorker piece linked above is a fair intro to the whole thing. If you can't find it you know where to ask.
Ain't me doing the cracking, big boy. Thank Ms Berlant here for exposing your synapses to this great stuff - not least of which is the reference to the Johnson story. A true belter IMO.